Maggie Gallagher apparently has forgotten the meaning of the words "journalistic ethics." She also seems to think that because she didn't negotiate as good a deal as Armstrong Williams that her actions aren't as reprehensible. Talking to Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post, who blew the whistle on Gallagher's arrangement, she defiantly said "Did I violate journalistic ethics by not disclosing it? I don't know. You tell me." To make matters worse, after initially defending her actions, she changed her story somewhat, saying:
"I should have disclosed a government contract when I later wrote about the Bush marriage initiative. I would have, if I had remembered it. My apologies to my readers."Ok, so now it was an oversight. This brand of arrogance, so prevalent in anybody remotely associated with (i.e., being paid by) the Bush administration, is just plain sickening. A half-hearted apology hardly makes it here, especially when there is a total lack of journalistic responsibility.
The sad fact is that the exposure of Williams and Gallagher only begs an even more disturbing question: How many more Bush shills posing as legitimate journalists are out there? Will they be exposed? If so, will any real action be taken? Will anyone care? The Jayson Blair incident seems so tame by comparison.
- Second Columnist Got Money from Bush Administration